Question from Zhang Jinjian's column: I am 58 years old and a housewife. Due to my late marriage, I now have a son and a daughter, and I am still studying in university. Usually, my life is quite regular, but I am a little fat. From the age of 40, I have had routine health checkups every two years. (Breast health checkup should be done by your husband. If your husband doesn’t know that you have lumps in your breasts, it means he doesn’t love you anymore)
At the beginning of August last year, in view of the government's strong advocacy that women aged 50 to 69 can have free mammograms every two years, I also went to a nearby medical center for a mammogram screening and found that there was a mammogram on the outside of the right breast. Abnormal calcifications were recommended by a doctor. She was hospitalized for fine-needle stereotaxy and excision of suspicious calcifications. Histopathological biopsy confirmed that it was ductal carcinoma in situ. (The calcification point is mentioned here, but it doesn’t say how it came about. Western medicine is really stupid. Only milk in women’s breasts is rich in calcium, so only milk stagnates in it can cause this calcification point. Doesn’t this just mean breast cancer? Did it come from the accumulation of milk?)
I have always been healthy, but after hearing the news, I was worried and worried about the follow-up treatment. Is the entire mastectomy required? Need to do axillary lymph node dissection? Do I need radiation therapy? (Reader / Mrs. Wang) (This woman is superstitious about Western medicine, so her question does not include Chinese medicine treatment, as if Chinese medicine has not existed for five thousand years)
Answer: You don’t need to worry too much if you can find stage 0 breast carcinoma in situ during mammogram screening. It is unfortunate news to have cancer, but early detection is the greatest blessing in misfortune. In general, stage zero breast cancer in situ has an excellent prognosis, with a 10-year survival rate close to 100%. (Because the initial stage is only caused by the accumulation of old milk, at this time, if the Chinese medicine treats it, it only takes about two weeks, sometimes it will be fine in one week, and there is no need for surgery.)
If the carcinoma in situ lesion is less than 2.5 cm, low malignancy, and the safe excision range is greater than 3 mm, only local resection is sufficient; if the lesion is greater than 3 cm, and is high malignancy, or combined with micro-invasiveness, or the pathology belongs to pimples For those with necrosis, or the resection margin is very close to the lesion, and there are multiple lesions, simple total mastectomy may be considered. (Breast cancer can become malignant because patients continue to eat nutritional supplements, eat dairy products or drink milk, or take western medicines that increase milk production, such as female hormones, etc., and because patients undergo surgery to slice or remove early lumps Scar tissue is more likely to be caused by the accumulation of milk in some places. At this time, Chinese medicine knows that breast cancer is caused by the accumulation of old milk, so we only need to remove it, and there is no need to remove the breast. Of the breasts, is it a woman? Life would be better than death for sure.)
If it is between the above two, according to three large clinical studies, tumor resection plus postoperative radiation therapy should be the standard of treatment. As for carcinoma in situ, the probability of metastasizing to axillary lymph nodes is extremely small, only about 1.4%, so it is not necessary to consider removal of axillary lymph nodes. (So far, this Western medicine treatment principle has not known how many women have died because of it. Western medicine still continues to use it. There should be no exceptions in real medicine. As long as one person dies due to treatment, it is due to the treatment. This killing treatment should be abandoned, many ignorant women have died not because of breast cancer at all, but because the treatment of western medicine is too poisonous and too strong.)
Unless the degree of malignancy is extremely high, combined with invasive breast cancer lesions and the lesion is diffuse and multiple, axillary lymph node dissection or the recently widely used sentinel lymph node section surgery should be considered, but these patients occupy the breast in situ The rate of cancer patients is extremely low; if the estrogen hormone receptor in the lesion tissue is positive, anti-hormonal therapy can be considered, such as Tamoxifene or aromatic unitary inhibitors, etc., which can generally reduce local recurrence and reduce the incidence of contralateral breast cancer . (Reply by Zhang Jinjian, professor of surgery at National Taiwan University School of Medicine and chairman of the Breast Cancer Prevention Foundation) (Here is talking nonsense again. Now the American AMA has admitted that Tamoxifen cannot prevent the recurrence of breast cancer at all, but this person does not update his knowledge of Western medicine. What kind of Western medicine is used for the treatment? Currently, the death rate of breast cancer ranks second in the United States, and the first is lung cancer. This means that Western medicine cannot cure breast cancer. The reason is that Western medicine still does not know how breast cancer occurs, so it cannot be prevented. also cannot be cured)
Comment
This article is the standard western medicine answer. There is no explanation of how breast cancer comes from throughout the article. Now we will add explanations from the Fang family to prevent the public from being misunderstood again.
Misleading by wrong medical concepts, the part in red is the explanation made by the Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Health established by Jing Fangjia, the northern school, readers are invited to appreciate it.
The conclusion is: breast cancer can be completely cured by seeing Chinese medicine, and only Chinese medicine knows how breast cancer came about, so it can really prevent the recurrence of breast cancer.
